In this specific, three-voice canon, the
artifice (highly praised by musicians of the past) of double
counterpoint at the twelfth is employed, in which the two first
parts in play lead, by canonical imitation, the third voice;
which enters after the pause separating Proposal from Response
(in this case after a semibreve).
Adherence to the privative rules that govern this counterpoint,
correspond to the deprivation of the sixth interval (understood
as consonance) between the two of them (A and B), and allows the
dissonances (obviously linked) of
Fourth and Eleventh above, resolved to the
Third and Tenth, as well as
to the ninth below, resolved to the tenth.
Two types of canon can be realized, depending on the setting of
the response pouring, we can realize the canon
by pouring the proposal a
low fifth
and recopying the response an
octave high 5/8
by pouring the proposal one
octave low
and copying the answer one
fifth high 8/5.
Thus, the case under consideration is No.
1
In fact, the third voice (C) is the transport of the voice
(B), an octave above
Let us see, the comparison section of the tabula, related to the
double counterpoint to the twelfth
The green boxes represent consonance shares between B and C,
while the colorless boxes mark dissonances
or consonances without mutual correspondence.
C
B
|
|
Consonances and dissonances between counterpoint and subject
matter
Finally, we can check the nature of the interval relationship,
between
A and
B (the canon matrix) and the added
part
C,
produced by pouring back to the octave above B, by comparing the
consonances and dissonances between the musical score and the
numerical superposition given above.
The experience gained allowed to proceed smoothly, but observing
the privative rules (without sixth as consonance) that donated
the canonical imitation of the third and wanting, of the
fourth
part.